Wednesday, March 30, 2016

Rush--"Vital Signs" (Part One—where I barely discuss the song at all)

So one of my complaints about the X Ambassadors song “Renegades” was that it used a largely content-free and pretty watered-down notion of what it means to be a “renegade.” The result of that is a song about “living like a renegade, where the “like” part of that phrase does all of the heavy lifting, i.e., not about what it might actually be like to be a renegade, just posturing like one. Anyway, that got me thinking about songs that handle this topic better, and I want to discuss Rush’s “Vital Signs” as such a candidate.

Now just as I had to do a little introduction about The Posies and The Mountain Goats since they are bands that mean a lot to me but aren’t exactly on everyone’s radar, I will kind of do the same for Rush. Now, Rush are a lot more successful and well-known than either of these bands and have an incredibly dedicated fanbase (I can’t imagine there are too many other acts who release so many live albums that sell so consistently), but for all of that there is a sense among fans that Rush doesn’t get the recognition they deserve. (Although they did recently get the hall of fame nod, whatever that’s worth, and that let their guitarist Alex Lifeson give his epic acceptance speech—a speech which, in what might be a sign of its comic genius, I’m ambivalent about: on the one hand, the way he gives all of the appearance of sense with his use of pause and intonation is well done, and the satirization of the general meaningless of the blather that passes for such speeches is apt, but on the other hand, its hard not to detect a level of mean-spiritedness to it that might go a little too far, maybe a little too long. But I think it’s ok to walk that line and perhaps fail because it was still a hell of a thing to attempt.)
 

Anyway, I can definitely expose myself as a typical Rush fan insofar as I got into Rush in my teens and I saw in them a unique voice decrying the bland conformity of the world around them and I have all the albums (including most of the live ones) and I’ve seen them live three times already and I do think that Rush does need a little bit of explaining since most people don’t really know the real Rush.

Ok, now that I’ve got that out of my system, it can be easy to dismiss Rush as pretentious—they can seem too earnestly concerned with virtuoso musicianship, too nerdy, too Ayn Randy (in their early incarnations), too Geddy Lee screechy, and more—and all of that is largely true, but there is an honesty and a sense of playfulness to what they do that redeems all of that, you just might not always know it from the few songs of theirs you regularly hear on the radio. Anyway, “Vital Signs” is the last song off of Rush’s 1981 “Moving Pictures,” which was their biggest album (it’s where “Tom Sawyer” comes from, for instance), and also probably the album with the best punning synergy between title and cover—it’s so good.

Anyway, the first thing that I expect strikes listeners is how reggae and groovy it sounds with the syncopated guitar-work—something that I imagine seems very un-Rushlike until you think about how much prog is about weird time signatures and about what was going on with reggae and new wave at the time. There is an interesting interview with Neil Peart (Rush’s drummer and prime lyricist) done by George Stroumboulopoulos where Peart discusses the burgeoning awareness of reggae and New Wave at the time—you can definitely hear it here. 



As far as Rush’s development as a band goes, it fits in perfectly in a thematic/musical trajectory that goes “The Spirit of Radio”—“Vital Signs”—“Chemistry.”  The first song is off of the album “Permanent Waves,” which is just prior to “Moving Pictures.” “The Spirit of Radio,” which gets a fair amount of radio play (not surprisingly since it is a paean to the liberatory potential of radio), has a really interesting groove section near the end (3:47) where they play off of the lyrics of Simon and Garfunkel’s “The Sound of Silence,” and it is all about the potential impact that technological media can have upon our lives. “Chemistry” is off the album after “Moving Pictures,” “Signals,” and it forms an extended analogy between chemical reactions and human relations. It’s not one of Rush’s greatest songs by a long shot, but it does capture one of their abiding concerns—how the developments of the modern world (particularly the scientific and the technological) affect the ways we think about ourselves without simply decrying them as negative. I think that “Vital Signs” participates in this conversation as a perfect middle ground, delving into the parallels between life and machine in order to produce a picture of life that is very far from mechanistic.

Monday, March 7, 2016

X Ambassadors – “Renegades”; or, When You Probably Shouldn't Go Determinate




I don’t have a lot to say about this song because it isn’t really good or bad: it’s a catchy piece of radio fodder with a message fitting for our age—be yourself, do your own thing, don’t just go with whatever society tells you, be a special snowflake just like everyone else, etc. (It’s not surprising that this quickly got picked up by a Jeep commercial.) 


All of this is well and good and generally uninteresting except for the one point where its generic and bland exhortations to do something different actually gets specific—at that point this song gets stuck in my craw:

All hail the underdogs
All hail the new kids
All hail the outlaws
Spielberg's and Kubrick's

Even if we can overlook the conflation of underdogs, new kids, and outlaws with renegades, the choice of Steven Spielberg as one of the only two concrete examples of a “renegade” in the whole song just shows how ludicrous the song’s understanding of what it means to be a renegade really is. I’m not trying to put down Spielberg—I’ve enjoyed his movies, and it’s clear that he is a very creative and talented person who has had a big influence, but none of that makes him a renegade in any meaningful way. If he was ever an underdog, new kid, or outlaw, Spielberg hasn’t been one in a very long time. (I’m also not entirely sold on Kubrick as an example either—sure he was original or perhaps even pioneering in many of the things he did, but I don’t know if that’s the same as being a renegade.) I guess the band decided to go all renegade on the definition of renegade.